The shells of the karaka berry and the crayfish shells should not be seen from the Marae
15/01/2018
I often get asked how to move a board from being good to being great.
In my experience, three things distinguish a mediocre board from a high performing one.
The first is peer accountability. The second is choreography in ‘the moment’. The third is how they address poor leadership and lack of discipline.
With the weakest boards, there is no accountability. Mediocre boards use the Chair or loudest shareholder as the source of accountability. In contrast, high-performing boards manage the vast majority of performance with one another.
They do it immediately and respectfully. They do it because they are deeply connected to what they do and why and have meaningful measures, so everyone can challenge anyone if it is in the best interest of serving the mission.
High-performing boards:
How a board handles, this situation will let everyone know whether the Board’s highest value is keeping the peace or pursuing the mission and shareholder value. Weak and mediocre boards ignore these issues. High-performing boards do not shrink from this responsibility. They work with the person to improve, and if that does not work, they work with the person to find their next role.
Some will disagree with me about ‘finding their next role’. Every high-performing Board I have worked with goes this extra mile because it sends a message to everyone about the Board’s values and mission.
Te anga karaka, te anga koura, kei kitea te marae.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreWaitangi Tribunal Thursdays: Wai 13 …
He Waka Tē Ai Tahuri Waitangi Tribunal Thursdays is where I return to the Tribunal’s early reports, not as history or as legal analysis, but as maps of how the state is designed and how its policy advisory, delivery, and regulatory systems work. After the Motiti Island report, we turn to three short reports in succession: Wai 13, Wai 14 and Wai 15. Read quickly and independently, ...
Read moreLoose Threads: “Dear Colleagu …
Starmer, Free and Frank Advice, and What Three Jurisdictions Reveal About One Constitutional Problem On 7 May 2026, the night before local elections in which his party faced what most forecasters predicted would be a historic rout, Sir Keir Starmer emailed every civil servant in the United Kingdom. The email was, on its face, an exercise in reassurance. He thanked officials for their service. ...
Read moreTe Rā Whakamana: What the Interpre …
This is the next post in the regular Te Rā Whakamana series. The post on Cohen’s street-level entrepreneurs closed by saying that critical traditions all argue that implementation is never neutral, and that the policy frame the public management system carries always has politics built in. Today’s post takes that on. Vaughn and Balch’s chapter on a decolonial approach to policy design ...
Read more