The shells of the karaka berry and the crayfish shells should not be seen from the Marae
15/1/2018
I often get asked how to move a board from being good to being great.
In my experience, three things distinguish a mediocre board from a high performing one.
The first is peer accountability. The second is choreography in ‘the moment’. The third is how they address poor leadership and lack of discipline.
With the weakest boards, there is no accountability. Mediocre boards use the Chair or loudest shareholder as the source of accountability. In contrast, high-performing boards manage the vast majority of performance with one another.
They do it immediately and respectfully. They do it because they are deeply connected to what they do and why and have meaningful measures, so everyone can challenge anyone if it is in the best interest of serving the mission.
High-performing boards:
How a board handles, this situation will let everyone know whether the Board’s highest value is keeping the peace or pursuing the mission and shareholder value. Weak and mediocre boards ignore these issues. High-performing boards do not shrink from this responsibility. They work with the person to improve, and if that does not work, they work with the person to find their next role.
Some will disagree with me about ‘finding their next role’. Every high-performing Board I have worked with goes this extra mile because it sends a message to everyone about the Board’s values and mission.
Te anga karaka, te anga koura, kei kitea te marae.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreTime to Retire “Bad Apples …
A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreThe Implosion of the US Administrat …
The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...
Read more