The parson bird chatters, the parrot gabbles, the wood pigeon coos

1/9/2017

Last week, a graduate analyst I mentor asked why I’m so against evidence-based policy.

I was a little surprised.

I’m not against evidence. What I try to do, consistently, is make sure my advice doesn’t naively wish away the emotion, uncertainty, complexity, contest, power imbalances, and plurality that shape public policy.

For me, evidence-informed policy matters for two reasons.

First, it enables innovation and creativity. In the absence of absolute long-term certainty, evidence-informed policy creates enough headroom for the professions (the teachers, nurses, clinicians, social workers, police, soldiers, sailors, aviators, engineers, and scientists) to take the next step.

Second, it helps politicians cut through the noise and offer the electorate a persuasive narrative.

But evidence and professional judgement are not public policy choices. They are not alternatives. They are interlinked and inseparable, not unlike the distinct calls each bird makes in the ngahere.

E koekoe te kōkō, e ketekete te kākā, e kūkū te kererū.

It takes all sorts to make a world.

And, variety is the spice of life as my Irish Catholica nana used to say.

Disclaimer

These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...

Ahakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …

Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...

Time to Retire “Bad Apples …

A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...

Getting Regulation Right: Being Res …

Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...

The Implosion of the US Administrat …

The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...