The leader at the front and the workers behind the scenes
1/2/2018
Over the next few years, I will start blogging about the roles, responsibilities and competencies of Board and company secretaries in the context of the New Zealand public sector.
I suspect that most of these roles are underdone, misunderstood and an afterthought for most Boards and their chief executives.
I have long thought that this function should be undertaken by a dedicated cadre of accredited public sector governance professionals, led out of Treasury or the State Services Commission, or at the very least have a head of the profession.
I will borrow from the literature on boundary spanners and collaborative governance in exploring these roles. I will also lean heavily on my own experience and the training I receive from the Governance Institute of Australia. The GIA has been an essential source of information and accreditation for me (and thousands of others) as a board and company secretary in Australia and Aotearoa.
In exploring these roles, I will look at the broader State sector. I have chosen the State sector because there are over 3,500 institutional governance arrangements, from Crown entities to Crown companies to State-Owned Enterprises to various Trusts and Boards of Trustees. They all need some governance and secretarial support to make good decisions on behalf of the Crown.
I will begin by charting the institutional scape. I will then describe the roles and responsibilities of Board and company secretaries in the New Zealand public sector and compare them to the Australian public and private sectors.
I will then offer some ideas about what makes a good public sector governance secretary (Board and company). In doing so, I will also cover how public sector governance is different from corporate governance in a few things – all of which are material.
I also plan to share some of my own experiences and interview several Chairs about what they think a good public sector governance professional looks like beyond the usual communication, coordination, and compliance activity.
I suspect to find a considerable degree of commonality between the Board and company secretaries and the competencies required to support good public sector governance. I also expect to see one or two exemplars, with the rest being a mix of rudimentary administrative support or overly-sensitive legal advice.
I am doing this because I see Board and company secretaries facing considerable challenges in dealing with tensions and ambiguities arising from complexity, multiple accountabilities and confused governance forms. These challenges are contextual driven by the fact that most of these roles support a vortex of mixed objectives, including ministers, political appointees, Crown entity monitors, an
expansionist State Services Commission, chief executives, and senior leadership teams.
I am also doing this as I don’t see much local research or thinking on the vital role this cadre of governance professionals can play.
Much like marae tikanga with the speakers at the front and the workers are at the back, both jobs are equally important and are like the yin and yang, for without one, everything would fail.
Te amorangi ki mua, te hapai o ki muri
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreTime to Retire “Bad Apples …
A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreThe Implosion of the US Administrat …
The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...
Read more