The First Four
3/4/2025
Before I begin, I want to mihi to Hon Shane Jones. In the House yesterday, he reminded us of the first four rangatira who first stepped into Parliament on behalf of Māori.
He did more than recite names: he called us to remember them properly, to see them as political actors who helped shape the country.
In 1868, four Māori leaders: Frederick Nene Russell, Wiremu Katene, John Patterson, and Tareha Te Moananui stepped into a Parliament not built for them.
They entered a system that had already set its course against Māori interests. Yet they stepped in anyway.
Not simply to resist, but to participate in the shaping of the country.
They were formidable agents, working to hold the space open for Māori, while navigating a world that sought to close it.
Russell, the nephew of Tamati Waka Nene, was shaped by the north’s long history of conflict and alliance building. While he was quiet in the House, when he stood everyone listened.
Katene, the first Māori to hold a ministerial office, worked to bridge worlds, navigating a settler government in full stride towards land acquisition.
Patterson, from the south, worked under the heavy weight of belonging to both Māori and settler communities, trying to stitch them together as the fabric was fraying.
Then there was Tareha Te Moananui. From the east coast. From lands I know, though he is not of my hapū. But his family and mine share a coastline: the same shapes, the same tidal rhythms, and similar stories attached and shared about it.
Tareha was already a chief of standing, a Treaty signatory at Ahuriri. He was known, respected, and accustomed to leading.
He carried that leadership into Parliament.
Unlike others, he did not sit back.
He spoke often and directly, pressing on the government’s treatment of Māori land and rights.
He did not adjust himself to suit the chamber. He spoke as a chief. Calm, clear, and determined.
His words were shaped by a world where rangatira were expected to speak plainly and with purpose, whether on the marae or on the floor of the House, and follow that speaking up with action.
What matters is that none of these four simply sat through those years.
They all worked to shape the nation. They debated. They negotiated. They carried the heavy burden of representing Māori at a time when Māori presence inside the system was being questioned and undermined.
They were not ornamental. They were not accessories. They were not easily fooled. They were nation builders: working in contested space to ensure Māori had a voice in the project of nation-making.
For those of us from the east, knowing Tareha stood there, not simply as a name but as a presence, is still striking. He stood in the House at a time when the takings were underway, when the pressure on Māori to step back was relentless. He did not.
When Shane Jones reminded us of them yesterday, it was not just an act of commemoration. It was a reminder of political rhetoric and action are linked. These four rangatira did not simply try to slow history down. They worked to shape it, knowing full well the dangers and limitations of the space they were working within.
They were formidable, working in a system not made for them, and shaping the nation anyway.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreTime to Retire “Bad Apples …
A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreThe Implosion of the US Administrat …
The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...
Read more