PIF System Level Findings: Better at delivery of short term priorities than core business effectiveness and efficiency

1/2/2020

This post is a slight diversion.

The legitimacy of the public management system rests on its ability to demonstrate high levels of integrity and performance.

The public and their political representatives have a right to be confident that public ownership, funding, provision, and regulation do the most good while curtailing cost.

Analysis I have completed of all published PIF reviews suggests the public service has five quirks that, in my view, if left unaddressed, will inhibit improvement in the public management system no matter how hard officials work.

The first quirk of the system is that delivery against a Government priority is stronger than the effectiveness of core business, which is itself stronger than the efficiency of the core business (see graphic below). I summarise this as a public management system that appears to be better at managing issues and keeping Ministers happy than it is at building core institutional capability that adds substantial and enduring value to our communities.

Comment: Regulatory Standards Bill

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the regulatory standards bill. As someone involved in regulatory systems and policy, I want to talk about their design and likely impact. Let me be direct: these proposals lack any supporting evidence that they would improve our regulatory environment. Instead, they demonstrate a troubling pattern of overreach. The fundamental problems are st...

The Knowledge Wave’s Bitter W …

Apropos of nothing - except for the current vibe coming out of Wellington. Let's be frank about what went wrong with the Knowledge Wave circa 2001 and 2003. I remember sitting in those early conferences - all optimism and powerpoints about our gleaming tech future. But in reality, we were trying to bolt a Silicon Valley dream onto a country that runs on milk powder and tourist dollars. Here's...

Public Services in Crisis? A Tale o …

Note: This analysis was initially prepared as a commissioned piece for a local private sector client in December 2024. With their permission, I am sharing these insights more broadly to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about public service reform. While the core analysis remains unchanged - at the time this post was published - from the original submission, it has been formatted for wider circu...