PIF System Level Findings: Better at delivery of short term priorities than core business effectiveness and efficiency
15/5/2020
This post is a slight diversion.
The legitimacy of the public management system rests on its ability to demonstrate high levels of integrity and performance.
The public and their political representatives have a right to be confident that public ownership, funding, provision, and regulation do the most good while curtailing cost.
Analysis I have completed of all published PIF reviews suggests the public service has five quirks that, in my view, if left unaddressed, will inhibit improvement in the public management system no matter how hard officials work.
The first quirk of the system is that delivery against a Government priority is stronger than the effectiveness of core business, which is itself stronger than the efficiency of the core business (see graphic below). I summarise this as a public management system that appears to be better at managing issues and keeping Ministers happy than it is at building core institutional capability that adds substantial and enduring value to our communities.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreTime to Retire “Bad Apples …
A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreThe Implosion of the US Administrat …
The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...
Read more