Organised Silence

01/05/2022

Silence is associated with many virtues: modesty, restraint and politeness.

And, thanks to profoundly ingrained settler rules of institutional etiquette, people choose silence rather than confrontation or acknowledging difference.

I am doing a Phd in free and frank advice because I have seen far too many officials and officers in public and private sectors fall into line by choosing silence and submission rather than speaking up. People would rather say ‘Yes Minister’ or ‘Yes boss’ than help their governors make better decisions.

I am hoping my Phd takes some of the gold plating off silence.

Specifically, I am hoping my research shows that while silence is ubiquitous, Ministers do not expect it.

He rereke, Ministers understand how costly silence or the failure of officials to offer free and frank advice is to both their political goals and the public service as an institution.

In addition, the literature and research are clear, silence and the failure to enable and protect the regulated speech of officials exacts a high psychological price on individuals, creates anger and resentment, and can contaminate every interaction between management and governors and shut down creativity, and undermine productivity.

So, if you are a Minister or a board member reading this, ask yourself: Am I comfortable with hearing the truth to power from my advisors, or would I prefer they kept quiet?

Asked differently, do I place unanimity, polite relationships, and getting the work done above hearing alternative and different views, and at what cost?

Disclaimer

These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...

Waitangi Tribunal Thursdays: Wai 13 …

He Waka Tē Ai Tahuri Waitangi Tribunal Thursdays is where I return to the Tribunal’s early reports, not as history or as legal analysis, but as maps of how the state is designed and how its policy advisory, delivery, and regulatory systems work. After the Motiti Island report, we turn to three short reports in succession: Wai 13, Wai 14 and Wai 15. Read quickly and independently, ...

Loose Threads: “Dear Colleagu …

Starmer, Free and Frank Advice, and What Three Jurisdictions Reveal About One Constitutional Problem On 7 May 2026, the night before local elections in which his party faced what most forecasters predicted would be a historic rout, Sir Keir Starmer emailed every civil servant in the United Kingdom. The email was, on its face, an exercise in reassurance. He thanked officials for their service. ...

Te Rā Whakamana: What the Interpre …

This is the next post in the regular Te Rā Whakamana series. The post on Cohen’s street-level entrepreneurs closed by saying that critical traditions all argue that implementation is never neutral, and that the policy frame the public management system carries always has politics built in. Today’s post takes that on. Vaughn and Balch’s chapter on a decolonial approach to policy design ...