Organised silence

1/5/2022

Silence is associated with many virtues: modesty, restraint and politeness.

And, thanks to profoundly ingrained settler rules of institutional etiquette, people choose silence rather than confrontation or acknowledging difference.

I am doing a Phd in free and frank advice because I have seen far too many officials and officers in public and private sectors fall into line by choosing silence and submission rather than speaking up. People would rather say ‘Yes Minister’ or ‘Yes boss’ than help their governors make better decisions.

I am hoping my Phd takes some of the gold plating off silence.

Specifically, I am hoping my research shows that while silence is ubiquitous, Ministers do not expect it.

He rereke, Ministers understand how costly silence or the failure of officials to offer free and frank advice is to both their political goals and the public service as an institution.

In addition, the literature and research are clear, silence and the failure to enable and protect the regulated speech of officials exacts a high psychological price on individuals, creates anger and resentment, and can contaminate every interaction between management and governors and shut down creativity, and undermine productivity.

So, if you are a Minister or a board member reading this, ask yourself: Am I comfortable with hearing the truth to power from my advisors, or would I prefer they kept quiet?

Asked differently, do I place unanimity, polite relationships, and getting the work done above hearing alternative and different views, and at what cost?

Disclaimer

These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...

Submission on the Regulatory Standa …

I wrote a submission respectfully opposing the Regulatory Standards Bill in its current form. I made the case that the Bill fundamentally contradicts concurrent public service reforms, which are very good and much needed. I argue that the Bill, despite the considerable effort invested in its development by dedicated officials, does not serve Aotearoa's long-term interests in effective, accountabl...

What Is Democracy? Modern Transform …

Part 2 of 2: From liberal evolution to decolonial possibility In the first part of this exploration, we traced democracy's ancient foundations, from Athenian assemblies to Pacific governance systems, from Confucian virtue politics to the collision between Indigenous sovereignty and European colonial states. We observed how different societies addressed the fundamental question of political aut...

What Is Democracy? Ancient Foundati …

Part 1 of 2: A constitutional argument across time, empires, and oceans Today I got into an argument. Not a loud one, just the quiet kind where you feel the ground shift and think, hang on, is this really where we are now? A well-meaning person was presenting their idea of democracy. It was a lightly dressed version of representative government, with some deliberative garnishes: citizens' p...