Not speaking up is even more frightening than not saying anything
25/12/2023
Ahakoa haere tatou ki hea. Ka haere tahi tatou katoa.
Recently, I received messages from friends, family, and clients responding to an article I wrote for e-Tangata.
The messages came from a diverse range of people: those on the hauora and regulatory frontlines, current and former public servants, my Australian and Pacific clients, representatives from private sector companies I have collaborated with, and my iwi, hapū, and whānau ora clients.
The messages were overwhelmingly supportive except for one or two and a few trolls. There were two types of messages.
The first type related to an appreciation for the context I offered in the article, the question I raised about whether the current government has a “radical reform” or “reset” mandate, and my analysis of the government’s delivery confidence risks that, in my humble opinion, Cabinet will need to actively manage if they are to overcome the “delivery and governance problems” that sank the last government.
I did this analysis because so few media outlets had gone through the details of the coalition agreements and tried to map them holistically to the broader goals, let alone make an assessment of whether the coalition agreements are sufficient and whether the governance arrangements are robust enough to oversee the various “projects”.
The second type was about how brave I was to put my thoughts out in public. These messages came out of a concern for my well-being, as some influential people had not taken kindly to me offering my analysis.
In my response to every message, I said I stood by my analysis and decision to offer it publically. Frankly, if those in governance positions cannot actively manage risk, they are unfit for office: identifying, mitigating and overseeing risk is a critical pre-condition of good governance.
Also, I am non-partisan: I have contributed financially to every political party in Parliament except for one. I am only interested in whether our shared institutions contribute positively to Aotearoa-Hou and whether individual politicians have the skills and experience to do a good job, i.e., public sector governance.
Finally, I resigned all my crown appointments and contracts the day before the article was published: that seemed the right thing to do.
For those who are hesitant to speak out, please push yourself to do so. The worst that can happen is that some anonymous trolls will email you nasty messages. I’m positive these messages are from the same person and the same computer: so I am unconcerned about my safety.
Also, over the past 20-odd years, I’ve learned that speaking up gets easier with time. And, as I enter my “kōkā years,” I have finally learned that not speaking up is even more frightening than not saying anything, especially in an area where you are the expert.
Also, I’m not anti-government – I just don’t like bad governance or bad public policy.
Kia haumaru te noho, ngā manaakitanga.
Comment: Regulatory Standards Bill
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the regulatory standards bill. As someone involved in regulatory systems and policy, I want to talk about their design and likely impact. Let me be direct: these proposals lack any supporting evidence that they would improve our regulatory environment. Instead, they demonstrate a troubling pattern of overreach. The fundamental problems are st...
Read moreThe Knowledge Wave’s Bitter W …
Apropos of nothing - except for the current vibe coming out of Wellington. Let's be frank about what went wrong with the Knowledge Wave circa 2001 and 2003. I remember sitting in those early conferences - all optimism and powerpoints about our gleaming tech future. But in reality, we were trying to bolt a Silicon Valley dream onto a country that runs on milk powder and tourist dollars. Here's...
Read morePublic Services in Crisis? A Tale o …
Note: This analysis was initially prepared as a commissioned piece for a local private sector client in December 2024. With their permission, I am sharing these insights more broadly to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about public service reform. While the core analysis remains unchanged - at the time this post was published - from the original submission, it has been formatted for wider circu...
Read more