Methods: Mixed Ata and Q Methodology
28/08/2023
Over the past few years, we have been increasingly using Q methodology.
It’s a mixed methodology: combining the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Q methodology was developed by William Stephenson in the 1930s. He designed it to bring a scientific framework to bear on the subtlety and intangibility of subjectivity and subjective views.
We like it because it allows participants to represent their perspectives for the purposes of holding them constant for review and comparison.
That means that people are centred: as opposed to the question or the researcher, which is practically what happens in most r-method-based research.
In addition to being more people-centred, the methodology does not test participants or impose a priori meanings. Instead, participants get to decide what is meaningful and significant from their perspective.
We also like the rigour the data offers. Through factorial and correlation analysis, we can reveal and rank how groups see an issue and the stories they tell about the subject.
Few other methods capture the essence of what the participants feel about a topic from collective voices while at the same time identifying subtle differences between some of the voices.
We will say some more about the methodology in the coming weeks.
Te Rā Whakamana: Operational Capac …
Schick, then Ryan and Gill (2011), and Tenbensel et al (2026) This week, the series reads three pieces of local implementation scholarship alongside one another, written across the better part of three decades and from quite different vantage points. There is Allen Schick’s 1996 review of the reforms, and the warnings it carried. There is Bill Ryan and Derek Gill’s later account, written i...
Read moreAdministrative Burden: The Woman …
When the State Designs for a Person Who Does Not Exist This is the fourth post in a series about what it actually costs to navigate the state. Last month, I examined how burdens fall hardest on the least resourced. I also introduced the research on “deservingness”. Today, I turn to gender. The hypothesis that the unpaid labour of navigating the state falls disproportionately on women, and ...
Read moreLoose Threads: The Other Allison
E te whānau. A longer Loose Thread this week, prompted by a moment in Beijing that has sent half the commentariat scrambling for their Thucydides. Graham Allison is having his moment in the foreign policy sun. But the Allison I want to talk about is the one almost nobody remembers. This post starts with his trap, notes who was already using it, and then turns to an argument about gover...
Read more