Methods: Mixed Ata and Q Methodology

28/8/2023

Over the past few years, we have been increasingly using Q methodology.

It’s a mixed methodology: combining the strengths of qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Q methodology was developed by William Stephenson in the 1930s. He designed it to bring a scientific framework to bear on the subtlety and intangibility of subjectivity and subjective views.

We like it because it allows participants to represent their perspectives for the purposes of holding them constant for review and comparison.

That means that people are centred: as opposed to the question or the researcher, which is practically what happens in most r-method-based research.

In addition to being more people-centred, the methodology does not test participants or impose a priori meanings. Instead, participants get to decide what is meaningful and significant from their perspective.

We also like the rigour the data offers. Through factorial and correlation analysis, we can reveal and rank how groups see an issue and the stories they tell about the subject.

Few other methods capture the essence of what the participants feel about a topic from collective voices while at the same time identifying subtle differences between some of the voices.

We will say some more about the methodology in the coming weeks.

Disclaimer

These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...

Ahakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …

Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...

Time to Retire “Bad Apples …

A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...

Getting Regulation Right: Being Res …

Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...

The Implosion of the US Administrat …

The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...