Hurihia to aroaro ki te ra tukuna to atarangi kia taka ki muri i a koe
1/1/2023
This is one of my favourite whakataukī. I first saw it used by Te Ohu Kaimoana to bring iwi together to complete the fisheries settlement. In watching that work, I think the whakataukī means to let the shadows fall behind us, so we may see one another’s faces.
It’s our version of sunlight being the best disinfectant. It is also how I see the revolving door phenomenon in Aotearoa. This post covers how I define revolving doors and why they matter.
A revolving door refers to the movement of a person into and out of crucial policymaking and decision-making roles in the executive, parliament and legislative branches, as well as the regulatory agencies.
There are six main types:
Industry-to-government, through which corporate executives are appointed to key roles in government.
Government-to-industry, through which officials (elected and not) move to lucrative private-sector posts in which they may use their government experience and networks to unfairly benefit their new employer.
Lobbyist-to-government through which lobbyists move from the consultancy sector think tanks or trade associations into policy or decision-making positions in government.
Government-to-lobbyist, through which former lawmakers and executive-branch officials (elected or not) become paid advocates and use inside connections to advance corporate clients’ interests.
Regulated party to the regulator and visa versa raises the possibility of a bias in policy shaping the regulatory environment, enforcement and cost recovery or levies.
Journalists to Press Secretaries raises the possibility of a bias in reporting and shaping of the political authorising environment and context.
Why do they matter?
First, we do not know the scale, but we know this goes on.
Second, it undermines the integrity of public officials and, in particular, whether conflict-of-interests are appropriately managed to mitigate bias in shared decision-making.
Third, it’s hard to push back against the concern held by some that there are unduly cosy relationships between influential people shaping the decision-making across Aotearoa’s pubic institutions.
Finally, there is a sense that without a public register of conflicts of interest or a cooling-off period, one is left with inequitable and unequal access to shaping policy or influencing decision-making.
Time for a tidy-up. Time to see the sun on everyone’s faces.
Comment: Regulatory Standards Bill
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the regulatory standards bill. As someone involved in regulatory systems and policy, I want to talk about their design and likely impact. Let me be direct: these proposals lack any supporting evidence that they would improve our regulatory environment. Instead, they demonstrate a troubling pattern of overreach. The fundamental problems are st...
Read moreThe Knowledge Wave’s Bitter W …
Apropos of nothing - except for the current vibe coming out of Wellington. Let's be frank about what went wrong with the Knowledge Wave circa 2001 and 2003. I remember sitting in those early conferences - all optimism and powerpoints about our gleaming tech future. But in reality, we were trying to bolt a Silicon Valley dream onto a country that runs on milk powder and tourist dollars. Here's...
Read morePublic Services in Crisis? A Tale o …
Note: This analysis was initially prepared as a commissioned piece for a local private sector client in December 2024. With their permission, I am sharing these insights more broadly to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about public service reform. While the core analysis remains unchanged - at the time this post was published - from the original submission, it has been formatted for wider circu...
Read more