He hono tangata e kore e motu; kāpā he taura waka e motu
21/4/2022
I do a mix of paid and unpaid work these days.
Last night I facilitated a not-for-profit board through a workshop I run on creating positive relationships between the board room and management. In my experience, those boards that understand the importance of whakarangatiratangatia do much better than those who do not.
My motivation to design the workshop is based on a personal experience as an official. I hate being micro-managed. I have never liked being told what to do every five minutes, especially when I know I am more expert at my job than the person telling me.
About twenty years ago, I was preparing a Minister for Parliamentary Question time. Throughout the briefing, a senior manager kept interrupting me in a loud voice, “Are you sure that is right?”. I kept replying, “It’s the advice we have right now”, to which he would say, “Well, I am not sure that is the best advice”.
What struck me was how his need to be right made it difficult for me to respond to him positively. It also made it difficult for me to listen to what the Minister really wanted to know before going into the House.
It is possible the senior manager was being rigorous and wanted the Minister to be well briefed. But in reality, it was unhelpful and intrusive and degraded the advisory line. In the common poneketanga kupu– it chilled the advice. I mean, who wants to advise someone who does not want to listen or who already knows the answer?
Anyways, why does this matter? In today’s increasingly complex and diverse world, boardrooms have to draw on the expertise of professionals, experts and occupations different from their own. Suppose you are a board member that doesn’t know how to ask questions that build relationships based on mutual respect. In that case, you are more of a liability than an asset to that boardroom.
In the workshop, we discovered the board relied heavily on accusatory, aggressive and process questions. They noticed they asked mostly closed questions and were trying to catch management out. They also accepted that they spent most of their board meetings on broadcast – telling management what they wanted instead of asking powerful governance questions to get to the heart of the matter. They are now working on asking open, empowering questions.
Here are a few suggestions I offered to get them going.
As the whakatauki says, connections between people cannot be severed, whereas those of a canoe-rope can.
Ask yourself, am I actively building connections in my boardroom to build trust and disclosure, or am I more interested in being heard and expecting management to do what they are told? If it is the latter, you are probably degrading the company’s value, and everyone is too scared to tell you.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreThe First Four
Before I begin, I want to mihi to Hon Shane Jones. In the House yesterday, he reminded us of the first four rangatira who first stepped into Parliament on behalf of Māori. He did more than recite names: he called us to remember them properly, to see them as political actors who helped shape the country. In 1868, four Māori leaders: Frederick Nene Russell, Wiremu Katene, John Patterson, an...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreWas I Too Quick to Judge the Nine Q …
I was pretty critical of the last government for refusing to name outcome areas or set any shared targets for the public management system. They didn’t want to be pinned down. They said it was about flexibility and complexity, but in practice, it made it hard to know what mattered, who was responsible, or what success even looked like. And most importantly, in today’s always-on political e...
Read more