Beyond Westminster? 2022 Edition Hineraumati
12/12/2022
As we enter the third year of examining our governance model’s evolution, the central hypothesis remains: Aotearoa-New Zealand’s Westminster-derived system continues to show significant signs of strain. While most indicators remain consistent with last year’s assessment, two notable shifts warrant attention.
First, there’s a marked decline in the Cabinet’s narrative capability. Despite considerable activity and policy implementation, the government appears unable to articulate a coherent story about its achievements or direction. This communication vacuum is compounded by visible ministerial fatigue, suggesting deeper systemic issues beyond mere messaging challenges.
In parallel, we’re witnessing the emergence of a more credible opposition. The Leader of the Opposition and deputy have successfully crafted a focused narrative centred on three key themes: cost of living pressures, economic development, and public service delivery failures. Their message discipline and energy starkly contrast the incumbent government’s communication struggles and appear to be gaining public traction.
The public service assessment remains orange, with persistent concerns about institutional capacity and effectiveness. The continued outsourcing of core policy work to consultancies suggests an ongoing hollowing out of internal capability. Equally troubling is the failure of officials to effectively manage community engagement and expectations in policy development processes. A new and significant criticism has emerged from the infrastructure sector, whose leaders argue that the machinery of government (te poneketanga) lacks the structural capacity to enable their success.
These developments suggest we’re not merely witnessing temporary strains on our Westminster model but potentially observing its fundamental transformation. The question is increasingly not whether we’re moving beyond Westminster but what we’re moving toward.
Nau mai haere mai Hine Raumati. He iti tangata e tupu – he iti toki e iti tonu.
Comment: Regulatory Standards Bill
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the regulatory standards bill. As someone involved in regulatory systems and policy, I want to talk about their design and likely impact. Let me be direct: these proposals lack any supporting evidence that they would improve our regulatory environment. Instead, they demonstrate a troubling pattern of overreach. The fundamental problems are st...
Read moreThe Knowledge Wave’s Bitter W …
Apropos of nothing - except for the current vibe coming out of Wellington. Let's be frank about what went wrong with the Knowledge Wave circa 2001 and 2003. I remember sitting in those early conferences - all optimism and powerpoints about our gleaming tech future. But in reality, we were trying to bolt a Silicon Valley dream onto a country that runs on milk powder and tourist dollars. Here's...
Read morePublic Services in Crisis? A Tale o …
Note: This analysis was initially prepared as a commissioned piece for a local private sector client in December 2024. With their permission, I am sharing these insights more broadly to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about public service reform. While the core analysis remains unchanged - at the time this post was published - from the original submission, it has been formatted for wider circu...
Read more