Beyond Westminster? 2021 Edition Hineraumati

15/12/2021

A year ago, I posited that Aotearoa-New Zealand’s Westminster-derived governance model showed signs of systemic strain. The identified pressure points were numerous and significant: the transition to mixed-member-proportional representation, the expanded use of associate ministers and parliamentary undersecretaries, the integration of non-government ministers into the Cabinet, the frequent threats to cabinet solidarity by coalition partners, inadequate regulatory impact statements, opaque performance reporting, an increasingly politicised public service, and the growing influence of policy networks.

The past year has provided compelling evidence reinforcing these concerns. Despite Labour’s achievement of majority government status, our democratic institutions continue to show signs of stress. While the main opposition has struggled with internal discord and failed to effectively scrutinize ministerial performance, some minor opposition parties have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in their oversight role.

However, several troubling trends have intensified. The Executive’s performance reporting remains inadequate, severely hampering Parliament’s ability to exercise its oversight function. More concerning is the apparent erosion of non-partisan public service independence. Policy development has primarily migrated from traditional public service channels to external working groups and consultancies (including my own involvement). This shift represents more than a simple change in process – it signals a fundamental transformation in how public policy is shaped and implemented.

Particularly worrying is the ascendancy of business case methodologies over robust public policy analysis and frameworks. This trend suggests a concerning prioritization of commercial considerations over public value creation. The overall situation in the machinery of government (te poneketanga) appears increasingly misaligned with traditional public service principles. Consequently, I have revised my assessment of institutional health from light green to orange, reflecting these deteriorating conditions.

Nau mai haere mai Hine Raumati. He iti tangata e tupu – he iti toki e iti tonu.

Download

Te Rā Whakamana: Operational Capac …

Schick, then Ryan and Gill (2011), and Tenbensel et al (2026) This week, the series reads three pieces of local implementation scholarship alongside one another, written across the better part of three decades and from quite different vantage points. There is Allen Schick’s 1996 review of the reforms, and the warnings it carried. There is Bill Ryan and Derek Gill’s later account, written i...

Administrative Burden: The Woman …

When the State Designs for a Person Who Does Not Exist This is the fourth post in a series about what it actually costs to navigate the state. Last month, I examined how burdens fall hardest on the least resourced. I also introduced the research on “deservingness”. Today, I turn to gender. The hypothesis that the unpaid labour of navigating the state falls disproportionately on women, and ...

Loose Threads: The Other Allison

E te whānau. A longer Loose Thread this week, prompted by a moment in Beijing that has sent half the commentariat scrambling for their Thucydides. Graham Allison is having his moment in the foreign policy sun. But the Allison I want to talk about is the one almost nobody remembers. This post starts with his trap, notes who was already using it, and then turns to an argument about gover...