Beyond Westminster? 2021 Edition Hineraumati

13/12/2021

A year ago, I posited that Aotearoa-New Zealand’s Westminster-derived governance model showed signs of systemic strain. The identified pressure points were numerous and significant: the transition to mixed-member-proportional representation, the expanded use of associate ministers and parliamentary undersecretaries, the integration of non-government ministers into the Cabinet, the frequent threats to cabinet solidarity by coalition partners, inadequate regulatory impact statements, opaque performance reporting, an increasingly politicised public service, and the growing influence of policy networks.

The past year has provided compelling evidence reinforcing these concerns. Despite Labour’s achievement of majority government status, our democratic institutions continue to show signs of stress. While the main opposition has struggled with internal discord and failed to effectively scrutinize ministerial performance, some minor opposition parties have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in their oversight role.

However, several troubling trends have intensified. The Executive’s performance reporting remains inadequate, severely hampering Parliament’s ability to exercise its oversight function. More concerning is the apparent erosion of non-partisan public service independence. Policy development has primarily migrated from traditional public service channels to external working groups and consultancies (including my own involvement). This shift represents more than a simple change in process – it signals a fundamental transformation in how public policy is shaped and implemented.

Particularly worrying is the ascendancy of business case methodologies over robust public policy analysis and frameworks. This trend suggests a concerning prioritization of commercial considerations over public value creation. The overall situation in the machinery of government (te poneketanga) appears increasingly misaligned with traditional public service principles. Consequently, I have revised my assessment of institutional health from light green to orange, reflecting these deteriorating conditions.

Nau mai haere mai Hine Raumati. He iti tangata e tupu – he iti toki e iti tonu.

Download

Comment: Regulatory Standards Bill

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the regulatory standards bill. As someone involved in regulatory systems and policy, I want to talk about their design and likely impact. Let me be direct: these proposals lack any supporting evidence that they would improve our regulatory environment. Instead, they demonstrate a troubling pattern of overreach. The fundamental problems are st...

The Knowledge Wave’s Bitter W …

Apropos of nothing - except for the current vibe coming out of Wellington. Let's be frank about what went wrong with the Knowledge Wave circa 2001 and 2003. I remember sitting in those early conferences - all optimism and powerpoints about our gleaming tech future. But in reality, we were trying to bolt a Silicon Valley dream onto a country that runs on milk powder and tourist dollars. Here's...

Public Services in Crisis? A Tale o …

Note: This analysis was initially prepared as a commissioned piece for a local private sector client in December 2024. With their permission, I am sharing these insights more broadly to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about public service reform. While the core analysis remains unchanged - at the time this post was published - from the original submission, it has been formatted for wider circu...