Beyond Westminster? 2021 Edition Hineraumati
13/12/2021
A year ago, I posited that Aotearoa-New Zealand’s Westminster-derived governance model showed signs of systemic strain. The identified pressure points were numerous and significant: the transition to mixed-member-proportional representation, the expanded use of associate ministers and parliamentary undersecretaries, the integration of non-government ministers into the Cabinet, the frequent threats to cabinet solidarity by coalition partners, inadequate regulatory impact statements, opaque performance reporting, an increasingly politicised public service, and the growing influence of policy networks.
The past year has provided compelling evidence reinforcing these concerns. Despite Labour’s achievement of majority government status, our democratic institutions continue to show signs of stress. While the main opposition has struggled with internal discord and failed to effectively scrutinize ministerial performance, some minor opposition parties have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in their oversight role.
However, several troubling trends have intensified. The Executive’s performance reporting remains inadequate, severely hampering Parliament’s ability to exercise its oversight function. More concerning is the apparent erosion of non-partisan public service independence. Policy development has primarily migrated from traditional public service channels to external working groups and consultancies (including my own involvement). This shift represents more than a simple change in process – it signals a fundamental transformation in how public policy is shaped and implemented.
Particularly worrying is the ascendancy of business case methodologies over robust public policy analysis and frameworks. This trend suggests a concerning prioritization of commercial considerations over public value creation. The overall situation in the machinery of government (te poneketanga) appears increasingly misaligned with traditional public service principles. Consequently, I have revised my assessment of institutional health from light green to orange, reflecting these deteriorating conditions.
Nau mai haere mai Hine Raumati. He iti tangata e tupu – he iti toki e iti tonu.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreThe First Four
Before I begin, I want to mihi to Hon Shane Jones. In the House yesterday, he reminded us of the first four rangatira who first stepped into Parliament on behalf of Māori. He did more than recite names: he called us to remember them properly, to see them as political actors who helped shape the country. In 1868, four Māori leaders: Frederick Nene Russell, Wiremu Katene, John Patterson, an...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreWas I Too Quick to Judge the Nine Q …
I was pretty critical of the last government for refusing to name outcome areas or set any shared targets for the public management system. They didn’t want to be pinned down. They said it was about flexibility and complexity, but in practice, it made it hard to know what mattered, who was responsible, or what success even looked like. And most importantly, in today’s always-on political e...
Read more