Beyond Westminster? 2020 Edition Hineraumati

14/12/2020

Aotearoa-New Zealand’s political and administrative landscape is undergoing a profound transformation that challenges its Westminster foundations.

Multiple forces are driving this evolution: the complex dynamics of a post-colonial state, a hollowed-out public service increasingly reliant on non-state actors for delivery, and political parties struggling to attract high-calibre talent for senior positions.

The strain on our traditional Westminster model manifests in several interconnected ways. First, the transition from first-past-the-post to mixed-member-proportional representation has fundamentally altered the relationship between the Executive and legislature. This shift has introduced new governmental formation and operation complexities, particularly in maintaining cabinet cohesion.

Second, the evolving roles of associate ministers, parliamentary undersecretaries, and non-government ministers in the cabinet have created novel governance arrangements that the traditional Westminster model never contemplated. The established convention of cabinet solidarity has been further challenged by coalition parties’ right to disagree publicly with cabinet decisions – a significant departure from Westminster principles.

Third, accountability mechanisms are weakening. Poor quality regulatory impact statements and overwhelming yet often impenetrable performance information have diminished Parliament’s ability to scrutinise the Executive effectively. This opacity makes it increasingly challenging to hold ministers individually and collectively accountable.

Perhaps most significantly, the traditional separation between political and administrative spheres has blurred. Public servants increasingly navigate a complex landscape where they must simultaneously serve ministerial directives and the public interest – two masters whose interests don’t always align. This challenge is compounded by the emergence of policy networks that further complicate traditional accountability relationships.

While some of these developments mirror trends across OECD nations and could be viewed as democratically progressive, they represent a fundamental departure from our Westminster heritage. The cumulative effect suggests we’re not merely stretching the Westminster model but potentially transcending it entirely.

As these transformations unfold, annual reflection will be crucial to understanding their implications for democratic governance in Aotearoa-New Zealand.

Nau mai haere mai Hine Raumati. He iti tangata e tupu – he iti toki e iti tonu.

Download