Administrative Courage

1/2/2023

The practice of courage is an important trait for public servants worldwide and a quality and attribute necessary for ethical behaviour in most institutional settings.

In the literature, courage is described as a virtue, with managerial courage being depicted as a leadership attribute that encourages others to take the morally right course of action, given the standards of the various public sector professions.

It is also depicted as one of the ways the managerialists can appeal to and motivate the professions, who often have different ethics and ethical standards to the manager: by way of example, how a generalist manager who has only ever done policy work ensures social workers, teachers, surgeons, practice nurses or intelligence officials don’t compromise the standards of their profession.

The literature also depicts courage as an essential competency of public service leaders. This research notes that most leaders must determine what it means to demonstrate their virtues in action. In this respect the literature on guerrilla government is useful.

This literature speaks to how some institutions are better than others at moderating courageous behaviour so that a lack of courage does not boil over into disengagement and active resistance. The case studies in this literature are illustrative. While they are primarily global north, we see an increasingly tense space between the managerialists and the professions, where baby boomers and Gen X cannot lead and manage the millennials and Gen Z.

Over the next few years, it will be interesting to see how the literature on administrative courage, guerilla government and public service motivation come together via the new Public Service Act. I rather think there will be some unintended consequences.

Disclaimer

These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...

Ahakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …

Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...

Time to Retire “Bad Apples …

A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...

Getting Regulation Right: Being Res …

Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...

The Implosion of the US Administrat …

The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...