PIF System Level Findings: Clientism

01/10/2019

This leads me to describe the fifth quirk in our system.

I am still exploring this quirk using a combination of political theory and research on institutions. So far, it seems that either Ministers are incredibly powerful in the current system (possibly too powerful), or the chief executive’s fixed-term contracts have weakened senior officials’ place in the system.

Consider this.

First, the system is better at delivering in the short term than at delivering its core business effectively and efficiently over the medium-to-long term.

Second, there is no correlation between how an agency engages and works with its Minister and outcomes. But doing just that is where almost every agency gets a green rating (see below). Said differently, there is a disproportionate amount of effort and attention placed on working well with Ministers and meeting their needs.

I am not saying this is a bad thing. A good relationship with a Minister is proactive. It helps a Minister and a government refine their goals and preferences to expand their options, identify the right priorities, and mitigate risks. Additionally, a good relationship is an aide to good decisions as officials (and others) are more likely to offer free and frank advice inside a good relationship than in a deteriorating one.

However, it is possible to hypothesise that Ministers and officials are focused on a short-term and urgent game at the expense of the medium-term and more extended view in the public interest.

I am still musing about this one.

Disclaimer

These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...

Waitangi Tribunal Thursdays: Wai 13 …

He Waka Tē Ai Tahuri Waitangi Tribunal Thursdays is where I return to the Tribunal’s early reports, not as history or as legal analysis, but as maps of how the state is designed and how its policy advisory, delivery, and regulatory systems work. After the Motiti Island report, we turn to three short reports in succession: Wai 13, Wai 14 and Wai 15. Read quickly and independently, ...

Loose Threads: “Dear Colleagu …

Starmer, Free and Frank Advice, and What Three Jurisdictions Reveal About One Constitutional Problem On 7 May 2026, the night before local elections in which his party faced what most forecasters predicted would be a historic rout, Sir Keir Starmer emailed every civil servant in the United Kingdom. The email was, on its face, an exercise in reassurance. He thanked officials for their service. ...

Te Rā Whakamana: What the Interpre …

This is the next post in the regular Te Rā Whakamana series. The post on Cohen’s street-level entrepreneurs closed by saying that critical traditions all argue that implementation is never neutral, and that the policy frame the public management system carries always has politics built in. Today’s post takes that on. Vaughn and Balch’s chapter on a decolonial approach to policy design ...