PIF System Level Findings: Good leadership lifts capability
1/9/2020
The fourth quirk speaks to the critical importance of good leadership by public servants and how it lifts capability (which itself enables outcomes).
While this is impressionistic, the agencies that rate highly on this dimension value authentic leadership and have senior leadership teams and boards who create an organisational spirit that encourages staff to be of service (see below).
This dimension also includes leaders who can create alignment between role, purpose, and organisational culture.
As noted in the published PIF reviews, these leaders are the type who do not default to their sense of the mission but enable a culture where the right thing is done, even when no one is looking. One might say these are leaders who embody the spirit of service.
Notably, the better performing parts of the system have leaders who embed workforce analytics. These leaders are always considering the future of work and how to steward the profession they are responsible for in a way that meets the needs of Aotearoa now and in the future. Practically speaking, these leaders develop other leaders for their agency and the wider public service. They see people management as an ongoing dialogue characterised by regular high-quality feedback.
The higher scoring agencies in internal leadership also reach for higher staff engagement through diversity and inclusion. They seem to understand that they need diverse thinking and give these people the trust, discretion, and tools to perform.
Disclaimer
These are my evolving thoughts, rhetorical positions and creative provocations. They are not settled conclusions. Content should not be taken as professional advice, official statements or final positions. I reserve the right to learn, unlearn, rethink and grow. If you’re here to sort me neatly into left vs right, keep moving. I’m not the partisan you’re looking for. These in...
Read moreAhakoa he iti kete, he iti nā te a …
Kia ora, and welcome I’m starting a blog. I’m as surprised as you are. This is a place to jot down my evolving thoughts about public administration, policy, and delivery in Aotearoa: beneath the surface and between the relays of elected and unelected officials. It will be about the undercurrents. Not the tired critiques or the glossy promises, but the patterns, tensions, compromises,...
Read moreTime to Retire “Bad Apples …
A plea from Ōtautahi. Can we stop using the phrase "bad apples" when discussing institutional problems? It is a tired cliché that has outlived whatever usefulness it might have once had. The idiom "one bad apple spoils the whole barrel" initially warned about how quickly rot spreads. Yet in contemporary discussions about institutional accountability, we've flipped its meaning to isolate and ...
Read moreGetting Regulation Right: Being Res …
Regulation often gets a mixed reputation. Some see it as unnecessary red tape, slowing things down and making life harder for businesses and communities. Others worry that it's too weak and fails to properly protect people and the environment. What both views have in common is frustration with regulation that seems disconnected from the real world. But good regulation doesn't have...
Read moreThe Implosion of the US Administrat …
The collapse of the US administrative state is not just an American problem, it carries important lessons for Aotearoa New Zealand. As Washington grapples with political dysfunction and the erosion of public institutions, we should pay attention to how a weakened state apparatus invites economic instability, political turmoil, and diminished democratic control. For Aotearoa New Zealand, th...
Read more